Mar 30 2013

“Travel Surveillance, Traveler Intrusion” at the Cato Institute

Edward Hasbrouck of the Identity Project will be speaking at a free, public forum on Travel Surveillance, Traveler Intrusion from noon-1 p.m. EDT next Tuesday, 2 April 2013, at the Cato Institute in Washington DC (with a live webcast):

Travel Surveillance, Traveler Intrusion

[photo by kind permission of Jeramie D. Scott]

Video from the Cato Institute (recommended)

Video from C-SPAN

C-SPAN video on Youtube

Audio podcast (listen while viewing the slides)

Slides and notes (PDF)

Featuring Edward Hasbrouck, Journalist, Consumer Advocate, Travel Expert, and Consultant, The Identity Project (PapersPlease.org), Author of the book and blog, The Practical Nomad; and Ginger McCall, Director, Open Government Program, Electronic Privacy Information Center; moderated by Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies, Cato Institute.

The United States government practices surprisingly comprehensive surveillance of air travel, amassing data about the comings and goings of all Americans who fly. Travel expert Edward Hasbrouck has been researching travel surveillance for many years. His findings reveal a stunning level of government surveillance, control of the traveler, and intrusion into commercial travel IT systems.

By April 2, the Transportation Security Administration will have begun a public comment process on its policy of putting travelers through imaging machines that can see under their clothes. Ginger McCall of the Electronic Privacy Information Center has been handling the litigation that prompted the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling requiring it to do so, and she will assess the proposed regulation and her renewed efforts to bring the TSA within the law.

If you can’t make it to the Cato Institute, watch this event live online at www.cato.org/live.

The Cato Institute asks that you pre-register if you plan to attend in person, but that’s just so they have an estimate of the expected attendance.

Hasbrouck will be presenting examples of what he found in his files when he sued the DHS for its records of his travels, what other travelers have found in theirs, and how the DHS obtains and uses this information to track us and to control who is allowed to travel.

As part of the same program, Ginger McCall of EPIC will be discussing the TSA’s proposed “rules” to require all air travelers to submit to virtual strip-searches. You have 90 days, until 24 June 2013, to tell them what you think of their proposal. (On the form to submit comments to the TSA, note that all of the fields except your comment itself are optional.) You can find some ideas for what to say in our previous article about the rulemaking.

There will be a live webcast, for those who aren’t in DC.

If you’d like to follow along, you can download the slides from Hasbrouck’s presentation as a PDF file.

[Update: C-SPAN broadcast the event live. Streaming video is available from the Cato Institute event archives (recommended), the C-SPAN archives, or on Youtube. The C-SPAN and Youtube camera angles don’t show the slides which illustrate Hasbrouck’s talk, so we recommend watching the Cato version and/or downloading the slides to follow along with the talk on C-SPAN. If you want to find out what’s in the file about you in the DHS “Automated Targeting System”, you can use the forms here. We would welcome a chance to review the government’s response, if you get one, and help you interpret it.]

26 thoughts on ““Travel Surveillance, Traveler Intrusion” at the Cato Institute

  1. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » California considers “enhancing” drivers licenses with radio tracking beacons

  2. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » How airline reservations are used to target illegal searches

  3. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » How the NSA obtains and uses airline reservations

  4. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » TSA’s lying “response” to today’s story in the New York Times

  5. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » “No-fly” trial, day 2: Dr. Ibrahim gets her (virtual) day in court

  6. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » “No-fly” trial, day 3: Why and how was Dr. Ibrahim barred from the U.S.?

  7. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Who will steal and reveal the “secrets” of the DHS?

  8. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Lessons from the first “no-fly” trial

  9. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Ars Technica asks DHS for PNR data, but gets none of it

  10. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » EFF: “Secret Law is Not Law”

  11. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » European court to rule on legality of air travel surveillance

  12. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Is the attack on Charlie Hebdo a reason for air travel surveillance?

  13. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Supreme Court to review Constitutionality of warrantless police access to hotel guest logs

  14. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » REAL-ID Act implementation, enforcement, and resistance

  15. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Accurint exposed as data broker behind TSA “ID verification”

  16. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » More pre-crime profiling of visitors to the US?

  17. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » No Social Security number? No passport. Why?

  18. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » How does your bank know that your dog’s not a terrorist?

  19. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Profiling travelers to find the “good guys” — and recruit them as informers

  20. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » What does Donald Trump’s election mean for our work?

  21. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » “AFI” is the latest DHS name for “extreme vetting”

  22. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Carrier sanctions kill. Airlines collaborate.

  23. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » FAQ: U.S. government monitoring of social media

  24. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS)

  25. Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » “Extreme Vetting” would be a #PreCrime #DigitalMuslimBan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *